Ted Heyd

Why shouldn’t streets be complete?

 

portland-015_crop
photo: Laura Sandt, pedbikeimages.org

Complete what?

Back in 2006, in California, I was in my boss’s office talking about a large-scale redevelopment project we were working on. In the midst of discussing some innovative street designs the applicant was proposing, my boss asked me if I was familiar with the concept of “complete streets.”

It was a bit of a deer in the headlights moment. I had heard the term but was still very green. He started giving me the basics and I was instantly intrigued. Streets intentionally designed to accommodate varying modes and abilities! I wanted to know more. It was a bit of a personal and professional tipping point.

Eight years later

Now, complete streets seems to be a household phrase in the realm of transportation planning. At staff meetings here at Bicycle Colorado, at networking events, at conferences and in trade journals, the term and its evolving applications seem to be everywhere. Is it a new era in transportation planning and facility design? That is open to debate, of course, but you can’t deny this:

  • In 2004, there were just 31 complete streets policies on the books throughout the U.S.,
  • As of now, 712 jurisdictions in the U.S. have adopted complete streets policies, and
  • In 2014 alone, more than 70 jurisdictions throughout the U.S. adopted these policies.

Want to wonk out on some of the best and brightest? Check out The Best Complete Streets Policies of 2014, released in February 2015.

So why complete a street?

Despite the unquestionable momentum, the ‘why’ question still rears its head on a somewhat regular basis. Not as often as it used to, but it surfaces nonetheless. Ever heard these?

  • Why add bike lanes on roads? Roads should be for cars and trucks.
  • Why are we investing in these bicycle and pedestrian improvements when we don’t know the return on investment?
  • Why should we add these facilities when nobody currently walks or bikes on this particular street?
  • Why are we paying for these facilities? Bicyclists don’t pay their fair share.

You and I know that these questions are based on incorrect assumptions, and we’ve talked a little bit in this blog about how to address these (see Serenity now! and What are roads for?), so let’s flip that question around.

Why not?

Like the “why,” the “why not” here is open to ongoing debate. For now, a few thoughts for when you get peppered by the guy you just met at a dinner party. Complete streets allow us to have:

  • Options—Not everyone can afford or wants to get around by privately owned motor vehicle, and roads are paid for through a variety of funding streams including sales tax, income tax and, of course, the gas tax. Our transportation system should therefore strive to meet the mobility choices of ALL those who pay for it, not just some.
  • Better safety—In many instances, complete streets better delineate the safest places for people in motor vehicles, on foot and on bikes to be and provide better ways for people to interact at intersections. This improves safety by reducing the potential for confusion and conflict.
  • Better air quality—In any community, a high percentage of trips are on the shorter side (two miles or less), yet most people drive for those trips, partly because of inadequate infrastructure. Imagine the global (yes, global) air quality benefits if more of these trips could be shifted to biking, walking or transit trips through the infusion of more complete streets.

If you want to keep peeling this onion, check out the 2014 report referenced above. It’s a good one! And please add to the conversation by sharing your thoughts in the comments.

Ted Heyd

About the Author: Ted Heyd

Ted manages our regional policy efforts focused on building out a more multi-modal transportation network. Ted thoroughly enjoys and spends much of his time collaborating with multiple advocacy partners along the Front Range. In his free time, he loves to mountain bike, hike and camp with family and friends.

Leave A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bicycle Colorado
@BicycleColo

"Truckloads of JUMP e-bikes are being destroyed for scrap across the country — and it’s raising big questions about… https://t.co/FQZ1VyL5oP

If you're curious about bike commuting but don't know where to begin, join us for our FREE Confident Commuting Webi… https://t.co/1iq0mX0Ghd

  • DON’T DELAY: We’re placing another order for #BicycleColorado masks made by our friends at @primalwear TOMORROW (5/14) at noon! Click the link in our bio to get yours now!
•
•
•
We’re thrilled to see so many people out enjoying (and often rediscovering the joy of) riding a bike right now, and we’re asking ALL bicyclists to do their part to prevent the spread of #covid19 by wearing a mask or other face covering when out for a ride. Doing so keeps you, your loved ones, those around you, and all Coloradans safer while helping reduce stress on our medical system. If you still need a mask, click the link in our bio to pre-order one now and support our advocacy work! Thanks so much to everyone who has already purchased, and to @primalwear for supporting our efforts over the years. Ride on.
  • #BicycleColorado volunteers and staff members spent time today helping @denverurbangardens and @denverfoodrescue deliver “Grow a Garden” food boxes to home-bound families in Denver—via bike! Supporting our community on two wheels makes for a great way to spend a sunny day. Many thanks to our friends @ddchen47, David M., and @juggernautcargo for your help! Head to denverfoodrescue.org or dug.org to learn more about these great local organizations. #rideyourbike
  • Tonight the #BicycleColorado team celebrated Stacey, our outgoing Development Director, with a virtual happy hour. Stacey has been an absolute rockstar for BC. We’re sad to see her leave, but thrilled for her as she heads out on a new adventure (hopefully in the #BikeAdvocacy space!) in North Carolina. Please join us in wishing her well!